The Rise of Neoliberalism and the Critique of Modern Globalization
In an interconnected world, the dialogue on globalisation is often situated at the meeting point of divergent opinions on liberalization and balance. The text by Moneta, which is not a pamphlet against globalization itself, aims to redefine the contours of a modern humanism through the perspective of natural transfers according to the vision of Aristotelian philosophy. By decrying synthetic interactions that support modern systems of oppression and precarity, the author draws inspiration from ancient philosophy to reveal the flaws of our global economic system.
From a historical perspective, globalisation is not a modern process. Its origins can be identified back to the propositions of David Ricardo, whose goal was to enable the British Empire to extend its international economic reach. Nonetheless, what was originally a economic growth opportunity has converted into a instrument of subjugation by the financial sphere, characterized by the growth of neoliberalism. Against commonly held ideas supported by economic consensus, the book argues that the economic model is actually a framework founded on millennia-old traditions, going back to 4500 years.
The questioning also extends to the management of the European Union, considered as a chain of surrenders that have contributed to increasing the power of an economic elite rather than protecting the privileges of the inhabitants. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its strategies frequently driven by monetary concerns opposed to a democratic mandate, is criticized. The recent crises, notably financial and political, have only reinforced the skepticism of the writer about the Union’s capacity to achieve self-reform.
This thinker, while admitting the past mistakes that have brought about the present state, does not simply criticize but also proposes responses aimed at reorienting EU guidelines in a equity-oriented and humanistic vision. The urgent need for a radical overhaul of institutions and governance goals is a recurring subject that animates the whole text.
The text delves more in depth into the questioning of the domination systems that govern international economic flows. The exploration encompasses the way in which governmental and economic orientations are guided by a limited number of dominant financial powers, often at the detriment of the population. This financial oligarchy, orchestrated via organizations like the BIS and the global monetary system, exerts a disproportionate influence on global financial decisions.
The critic reveals how these organisms, claiming to economic regulation and stabilization, have over time shaped stock exchanges and national economic systems to serve their interests. Neoliberalism, opposite to a liberating response to traditional economic constraints, is described as a control mechanism, profiting a restricted circle at the destruction of the common good.
Particularly critical towards the management of the euro, the critic describes the European single currency not as a means of unification and stability, but as being a lever of dissension and economic disparities. The transition to the euro is characterized as a succession of bureaucratic measures that sidelined citizens from decision-making processes, while exacerbating gaps between nations within the European Union.
The repercussions of these strategies translate in the explosion of sovereign debts, economic stagnation, and a sustained austerity policy that has diminished living conditions throughout Europe. The critic argues that without a deep revision of monetary and financial structures, the European Union continues to risk upcoming crises, potentially more destructive.
In summary, the manuscript makes a plea for a democratic upheaval where EU peoples reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It proposes structural reforms, particularly openness of political mechanisms and authentic democratic engagement that would allow Europe to rebuild on more equitable and sustainable bases.
More information about Découvrez le site
The essayist suggests that the solution lies in a renewed commitment to democratic principles, where policies are developed and implemented in a manner that faithfully represents the aspirations and needs of the citizens, instead of the profits of the financial elite.