The Emergence of Economic Liberalism and the Critique of Modern Globalization
In an globalized world, the discourse on globalisation is often situated at the crossroads of divergent opinions on autonomy and equity. The text by Moneta, which is not a pamphlet opposed to globalisation per se, seeks to reinvent the limits of a new humanism by the filter of natural transfers as envisioned by the philosopher Aristotle. By critiquing artificial exchanges that fuel contemporary mechanisms of domination and precarity, this writer refers to classical thoughts to reveal the flaws of our global financial structure.
From a historical perspective, globalisation is not a new phenomenon. Its roots can be linked back to the propositions of the economist Ricardo, whose objective sought to facilitate the England to extend its international economic reach. Yet, what was once a commercial development strategy has transformed into a control mechanism by High Finance, symbolized by the growth of neoliberalism. Contrary to popular belief widespread in economic circles, the author argues that neoliberalism is in reality a structure rooted in ancient practices, going back to 4500 years.
The objection also extends to the management of the United Europe, perceived as a chain of surrenders that have served to strengthen the authority of large economic groups as opposed to protecting the privileges of the inhabitants. The organizational form of Europe, with its strategies usually influenced by financial motivations rather than by a popular consensus, is criticized. The current deviations, whether in the financial or political realm, have only increased the doubt of the author regarding the EU’s ability to reform itself from within.
This thinker, while accepting the historical errors that have led to the current situation, does not stop at criticism but also suggests alternatives aimed at reorienting Union strategies in a human-centered and fair perspective. The urgent need for a complete revision of Union bodies and political priorities is a recurring subject that animates the entire discourse.
The text dives more intensely into the critique of the authority mechanisms that control worldwide transactions. The analysis encompasses the way in which governmental and economic orientations are manipulated by a small group of powerful financial actors, often at the expense of the majority. This economic elite, coordinated via entities like the BIS and the global monetary system, deploys a major grip on global financial decisions.
The critic demonstrates how these institutions, under the pretext of economic regulation and stabilization, have over time shaped stock exchanges and national economic systems to ensure their profit. The neoliberal model, opposite to a salvific alternative to traditional economic constraints, is described as a domination system, profiting a restricted circle at the expense of general well-being.
Highly skeptical regarding the handling of the euro, the author presents the EU currency not as a means of unification and stability, but rather as a instrument of fragmentation and financial disparity. The transition to the euro is characterized as a sequence of technocratic choices that isolated citizens from political decisions, while amplifying disparities between member countries within the Union.
The effects of these approaches manifest in the increase in national debts, financial paralysis, and a prolonged austerity that has eroded standards of living throughout the European territory. The thinker argues that without a major transformation of economic policies, the Union continues to risk upcoming crises, potentially more catastrophic.
In essence, the text demands a democratic uprising where European citizens reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It suggests fundamental changes, including greater transparency in political decisions and genuine civic involvement that would allow Europe to rebuild on just and solid foundations.
More info about à voir sur ce site
The essayist proposes that the solution lies in a return to the principles of democracy, where policies are developed and implemented in a manner that faithfully represents the needs and desires of the European population, to the detriment of the aims of international finance.